Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 03:28
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Are Hailee Steinfeld & Josh Allen getting married on May 31? - Buffalo Rumblings
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
NCAA v. House Case Settlement Update and Impacts at UNO - University of Nebraska Omaha
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How do I come out as queer to my best friend in a funny and stupid way?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why are Indians so influenced by the Western culture, when the Indian tradition has so much to give?
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What techniques can be used to sing like Freddie Mercury if one is unable to hit high notes?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why has no country adopted the SA80/L85 rifle?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
New Hope on Autoimmune Diseases: Sunlight - Newser
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Kate Middleton Glows in First Trooping the Colour After Cancer Remission - instyle.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.